Edition 29 - November 2005

Best Laid Plans Often Go Astray


For either assembly/JIT or traditional Build-to-Order operating systems to satisfy all the customers' demands (customization, speed, cost and quality) these systems must evolve again. This time, the evolution is to Flexibility: the ability to respond to changing customer demands without incurring penalties in time or cost.

Bottom-line improvements are proving difficult to realize for a lot of people attempting to design flexible shop floor control systems. Many have invested heavily in the ability to sequence work through plants. They've made substantial inroads in eliminating waste and in their management philosophies regarding how to approach cost cutting, new plant layouts, and new product development. Regardless, true flexibility continues to be elusive and shrinking profits are the result.

The question is often asked, "What is the biggest tactical hurdle to overcome for us to achieve the type of flexibility necessary to satisfy our customers and still make a profit?" The measure of the kind of flexibility that will satisfy customers and make money is the ability to change plans closer to the delivery point and not lose time or increase cost. In other words, the ability to resequence a schedule without cost penalty that's already gone through firm planning.

No matter how good the forecasting methodology or the shop floor control system, everyone has to change their plans. Many automotive manufacturers develop a sequence for production that gets scrambled because of quality issues as soon as the product goes through the paint process. Some suppliers who are affected by vehicle color have a system for resequencing their own production schedule in mid stream because of the frequency of schedule changes by the OEM. When this ability is built into the shop floor control system as an integral step in the process, the supplier is able to be flexible quickly and cost effectively. All it takes to see this in action is to watch the assembly process at the Johnson Controls plant supplying the Alabama Mercedes assembly plant. There are resequencing stations within their assembly line to allow last minute schedule changes. This allows a rapid response without huge expenses.

Resequencing is nothing new and has been around for a long time in a lot of manufacturing operations. It is called expediting. Expediting is an expensive way to be responsive. It is disruptive to overall production and costly in terms of lost productivity. It is not unusual to see excessive amounts of inventory in operations that expedite because the two seem to go hand in hand. As expensive as expediting is, many still do it, probably because they don't know of a reasonable alternative to meet customer expectations.

An alternative to expediting involves accomplishing two things: shrinking the order-to-delivery time by shortening both the firm planning time and the manufacturing cycle time; and early integration of customers and suppliers in the backlog management/planning process. The less time spent in planning and production the better, if for no other reason than that it reduces the opportunities for a customer to change an order before it is finished and shipped.

The best plans often have to be changed because customers change their plans. Creating the means to change will go along way toward being truly flexible and it may be the key for many of you to be profitable and competitive. Resequencing, when made a part of the operating system and without the build-up of inventory or disruption, can be the answer.

October 2005 Newsletter

December 2005 Newsletter



HOME | MISSION | ABOUT SPM | SYNCHRONOUS FLOW ORGANIZATIONS
| SYNCHRONOUS FLOW ASSESSMENT | PRINCIPALS | TYPICAL ENGAGEMENTS |
PREVIOUS ENGAGEMENTS | FAQ'S | PUBLICATIONS | CONTACT US